RK3328 vs. S912

RK3328 vs. S912

The AmlogicS912 chipset is the more notable chip of the two, no doubt, a larger scheme with 8 Cortex-A53 ARM centers. These components operate at 4 centers running at1.5Ghz and 4 low power stations running at 1Ghz.

This RockchipRK3328s runs on four Cortex-A53 ARM centers at 1.5GHz, meaning the Amlogic S912 will outperform the Rock Chips processor, in general, in CPU-based functions. This means further developed implementation when using Android applications, exploring the UI, and performing other daily tasks.

RK3328 vs S912: Video playback

With both the Rockchip RK3328 and Amlogic S912 focusing on Android TV boxes, it’s not unexpected that video playback execution is excellent on both chipsets.

Both chipsets can decode Ultra HD 4K video content up to 60 casing per second for H.265, VP9,​​and H.264 video codecs.

In addition, full HD playback of VC-1, MPEG-1/2/4, and VP8 recordings is additionally maintained.

Both can translate High Dynamic Range Video (HDR) when the next developed picture is related to a viable TV for quality. Both HDR10 and HLG designs are permanent.

Please note that none of the chipsets support the 10-digit H.264 codec that Anime fans are leaning towards, so it should be programming decoded into the code that indicates a routine unsupported video playback experience.

Those who expect to encode recordings get access to 1080p video encoding in both H.264 and H.265 designs.

RK3328 vs S912: Gaming Performance

While the RK3328 versus the S912 video playback is remarkably comparable, there is a serious loophole in the gaming implementation that leans towards the octa-center Amlogic S912.

The tri-center ARM Mali-T820 GPU in the Amlogics processor basically outperforms the more insecure ARM Mali-450MP2 in the Rockchip RK3328.

In my Android TV Box surveys, I have found that Amlogic S912 gadgets offer a robust gaming experience with many games planned on playable frames.

Not so with the Rockchip RK3328 gadget I’ve tried, most games are seldom playable except for the simplest titles.

If you are a gamer, settling on the Android TV box controlled by Amlogic S912 is an easy decision as opposed to RK3328.

RK3328 vs S912: Benchmark

While engineer benchmarks do not necessarily mean consistent execution, they are a great way to show execution contrast across different chipsets.

I’ve run various famous benchmarks on both RK3328 and Amlogic S912 gadgets I’ve investigated to perceive how these two chipsets stack up, with normal scores being utilized.

GeekBench 4.0, 3DMark, and Antutu 6.0 were used to fully determine the extent of S912 implementation against RK3328.

As you can see in the benchmark display below, the Amlogic S912 outperforms the rock chip RK3328 with a huge lead in most CPU and GPU benchmarks.

Interestingly, the Rockchip RK3328 outperformed the Geekbenchs single-center benchmark by about 15%. Nevertheless, the multi-center implementation was somewhat better than the S912 expected to have 4 additional low power centers.

Until the GPU is empowered, the Amlogic S912 totally beats the Rockchip RK3328 and affirms what I encountered during my gaming tests. In both the 3DMarks Ice Storm Unlimited and Ice Storm Extreme benchmarks, I saw the graphical show of the Amlogic S912 RK3328 on 2.4 to 2.6 events.

RK3328 vs S912 results

When it comes to video playback implementation, both the Amlogic S912 and the Rockchip RK3328 have a practically equivalent balance with incredible video playback support with 4K and HDR recording.

Anyway, the Amlogic S912 as we move forward with the components in the CPU and gaming execution, the Amlogic S912 with gadgets can probably offer a great client experience.

One thought on “RK3328 vs. S912

Comments are closed.